Consensus · Big Board

2026 Consensus Big Board

7 boards · 7 sources · updated Jun 23, 2026
The draft is in the books See how this board held up — steals, reaches & which mock won View the 2026 recap →

Based on 7 boards from 7 sources · updated Jun 23, 2026

# Δ Trend Player School Pos Ht Wt Age Avg Range Src
1 ▲1
Duke
F 6'9" 250 lb 19.1 1.7
#1
#3
7
2 ▼1
BYU
F 6'9" 210 lb 19.5 2.2
#1
#4
6
3
Kansas
G 6'5" 205 lb 19.6 2.3
#1
#3
7
4
UNC
F 6'10" 215 lb 20.1 4.0
#3
#5
7
5
Illinois
G 6'6" 185 lb 19.5 6.9
#5
#12
7
6
Louisville
G 6'5" 190 lb 20.4 8.3
#4
#17
7
7
Houston
G 6'4" 190 lb 19.6 9.0
#6
#15
7
8 ▲1
Michigan
C 7'3" 240 lb 21.3 9.3
#5
#13
7
9 ▼1
Arizona
G 6'4" 205 lb 20.9 9.3
#7
#16
7
10 ▲1
Michigan
F 6'9" 230 lb 11.1
#7
#17
7
11 ▼1
Arkansas
G 6'3" 190 lb 19.7 11.3
#6
#26
7
12
Michigan
F 6'9" 255 lb 20.5 12.9
#11
#19
7
13 ▲2
Stanford
19.3 15.3
#6
#23
7
14
Iowa
PG 6'4" 190 lb 22.9 16.4
#8
#25
7
15 ▲1
Baylor
G 6'5" 175 lb 21.7 17.0
#14
#26
7
16 ▼3
Alabama
G 6'4" 177 lb 17.1
#6
#37
7
17 ▲1
Kentucky
F 6'9" 225 lb 19.1 17.4
#9
#27
7
18 ▼1
Washington
F 6'11" 220 lb 20.3 17.6
#13
#23
7
19
Texas
F 6'7" 200 lb 21.1 18.7
#15
#24
7
20 ▲2
Texas Tech
G 6'2" 165 lb 20.4 21.3
#12
#28
7
21 ▼1
Santa Clara University
F 6'9" 225 lb 20.6 21.3
#9
#27
7
22 ▼1
Tennessee
F 6'10" 207 lb 19.7 22.4
#10
#38
7
23
F 6'8" 24.0
#16
#39
7
24
UConn
F 6'10" 260 lb 23.0 26.3
#21
#32
6
25
St. John's
F 6'9" 240 lb 22.3 27.0
#19
#34
7
26 ▲3
Iowa State
F 6'8" 220 lb 22.7 28.6
#21
#35
7
27 ▼1
Arkansas
G 6'5" 185 lb 20.0 28.9
#19
#44
7
28
Arizona
F 6'8" 235 lb 19.6 29.0
#18
#40
7
29 ▼2
Houston
C 6'11" 240 lb 19.5 29.0
#24
#36
6
30
UNC
F 7'0" 200 lb 22.4 29.0
#23
#34
6
31
Duke
G 6'6" 175 lb 20.7 32.9
#26
#43
7
32 ▲1
Valencia Basket
G 6'5" 20.7 33.4
#17
#48
7
33 ▼1
BYU
G 6'5" 200 lb 24.9 33.7
#17
#54
7
34
Ohio State
G 6'2" 215 lb 22.9 34.3
#16
#49
7
35
UConn
F 6'8" 210 lb 34.7
#29
#39
7
36
Arkansas
B 6'9" 34.8
#25
#45
6
37 ▲1
Louisville
G 6'4" 195 lb 22.1 36.0
#23
#42
7
38 ▼1
Cincinnati
F 6'11" 225 lb 22.5 36.0
#19
#41
7
39
Virginia
21.9 36.2
#24
#48
4
40 ▲4
South Florida
22.9 44.0
#35
#54
6
41
St. John's
W 6'8" 44.4
#36
#51
7
42 ▲4
Vanderbilt
22.9 44.8
#24
#55
5
43 ▼1
Arizona
G 6'3" 185 lb 22.9 45.1
#28
#56
7
44 ▼4
Kentucky
SG 6'4" 213 lb 46.2
#33
#60
6
45
46.7
#34
#68
7
46 ▲1
Houston
G 6'3" 22.4 47.3
#40
#60
3
47 ▼4
Vanderbilt
24.5 47.3
#42
#51
3
48
Purdue
G 6'0" 180 lb 23.0 47.7
#38
#58
6
49
Oregon
B 6'11" 23.2 48.8
#36
#55
5
50 ▲3
McNeese State
50.3
#42
#63
7
51
Tennessee
G 6'1" 22.4 50.7
#27
#73
7
52
Tennessee State University
G 6'6" 175 lb 51.2
#36
#70
6
53 ▼3
Duke
B 6'9" 22.7 52.9
#44
#62
7
54
53.3
#46
#59
6
55
Purdue
B 6'11" 24.7 55.0
#44
#66
3
56 ▲1
Illinois
G 6'2" 21.3 55.2
#33
#76
5
57 ▼1
George Washington University
23.4 56.0
#47
#82
5
58
Houston
PG 6'4" 183 lb 57.0
#43
#71
2
59 ▲1
Virginia Tech
23.3 57.7
#51
#66
3
60 ▼1
Iowa State
G 6'1" 200 lb 23.1 57.8
#48
#71
5
61
Northwestern
W 6'6" 22.3 58.5
#46
#80
6
62
Utah State
23.0 59.0
#44
#74
2
63
Auburn
F 6'7" 23.3 59.5
#44
#83
4
64
NC State
SF 6'4" 236 lb 60.0
#59
#61
2
65
Purdue
B 6'9" 24.0 60.8
#50
#83
4
66
Texas Tech
23.6 61.0
#32
#90
2
67
Indiana
G 6'4" 24.7 62.7
#58
#69
3
68
Florida State University
22.2 63.0
#41
#98
3
69 ▲1
Wisconsin
G 6'3" 25.3 67.0
#57
#77
2
70 ▼1
UCLA
F 6'9" 22.3 67.5
#47
#94
4
71
Miami (Florida)
23.4 68.0
#56
#92
3
72 ▲6
St. John's
F 6'7" 23.9 68.0
#52
#91
4
73 ▼1
University of Washington
20.1 68.3
#48
#95
3
74 ▼1
Florida State University
23.9 68.5
#59
#78
2
75 ▼1
68.7
#42
#86
3
76 ▼1
Jacksonville State
24.1 69.0
#60
#82
3
77 ▼1
BYU
23.5 70.5
#60
#81
2
78 ▼1
71.0
#67
#75
2
79
72.0
#63
#81
2
80
North Carolina
22.0 72.8
#53
#89
4
81
Southern Methodist University
23.3 79.0
#64
#94
2
82
Grand Canyon University
22.3 80.5
#77
#84
2
83
Akron
81.0
#59
#96
3
84
Syracuse
B 6'9" 84.3
#58
#98
3
85
University of Southern California
23.5 84.5
#69
#100
2
86
University of Utah
21.8 89.5
#80
#99
2

Viewing Prospects & Concepts . Each dot is a prospect — below the dashed line means this source ranks them higher than consensus, above means lower, on the line means they agree. Hover a dot for the pick. fuchsia = biggest disagreements.

Source analytics

deviation from consensus — how contrarian is each board?
Source Alignment Avg dev Spread Biggest outlier
Prospects & Concepts 97 8.5 Lajae Jones -30
Draft Stack 92 7.8 Donovan Atwell +34
Assisted Development 97 7.7 Rafael Castro -25
Floor and Ceiling 97 6.4 Peter Suder +33
Ersin Demir 97 6.2 Bryson Tucker +25
No Ceilings 98 4.3 Seth Trimble +27
Dizzle Dynasty 98 3.7 Seth Trimble +20
Contrarian percentile — where each source sits in the field
most aligned most contrarian
Source breakdown — top prospects each cell is a source's rank · above consensus · below · click a rank to open that board

Biggest Movers

Risers
Fallers

Most Controversial

Widest spread of source ranks

Source Spotlight

Deepest Board
AD
Assisted Development Ranks 100 prospects
◀ 42 fades 28 reaches ▶
Deepest pick William Kyle III #98
Read Assisted Development's full board
Ahead of the Curve
DS
Draft Stack The field is catching up
◀ 19 fades 28 reaches ▶
Called early Bryce Hopkins had #52 · consensus #72 ↑
Read Draft Stack's full board