Gary Payton II — Player Profile
Bio
College Production
PPG
25.7
Points
RPG
4.7
Rebounds
APG
8.1
Assists
SPG
3.4
BPG
0.5
TOV
3.7
MPG
37.8
Games
29
Started
—
Shooting Splits
FG%
50.4
3P%
33.3
1.8-5.4 3P/g
FT%
69.0
4.1-5.9 FT/g
Summer League
PTS
9.0
Points
REB
5.3
Rebounds
AST
2.9
Assists
| Season | Lg | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | FGM | FGA | 3PM | 3PA | FTM | FTA | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | GmSc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | LV | 3 | 26.6 | 11.3 | 7.0 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.7 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 73.7 | 83.3 | 50.0 | 85.5 | 12.8 |
| 2021 | CC | 1 | 26.1 | 13.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 46.2 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 48.4 | 10.1 |
| 2017 | LV | 4 | 19.5 | 8.8 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 3.8 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 46.9 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 52.5 | 8.7 |
| 2016 | LV | 2 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.5 | 50.0 | — | 50.0 | 4.4 |
| Career | — | 10 | 21.8 | 9.0 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 7.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 52.8 | 50.0 | 66.7 | 60.3 | 9.2 |
| 2021 | LV | 3 | 26.6 | 15.3 | 9.5 | 5.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 6.3 | 8.6 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 73.7 | 83.3 | 50.0 | 85.5 | 12.8 |
| 2021 | CC | 1 | 26.1 | 17.9 | 11.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 8.3 | 17.9 | 1.4 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 46.2 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 48.4 | 10.1 |
| 2017 | LV | 4 | 19.5 | 16.1 | 6.9 | 3.2 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 6.9 | 14.8 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 46.9 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 52.5 | 8.7 |
| 2016 | LV | 2 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 9.5 | 7.4 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 8.5 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.5 | 50.0 | — | 50.0 | 4.4 |
| Career | — | 10 | 21.8 | 14.9 | 8.7 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 11.9 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 52.8 | 50.0 | 66.7 | 60.3 | 9.2 |
| 2021 | LV | 3 | 26.6 | 20.0 | 12.3 | 6.5 | 4.1 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 8.2 | 11.2 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 73.7 | 83.3 | 50.0 | 85.5 | 12.8 |
| 2021 | CC | 1 | 26.1 | 22.5 | 13.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 10.4 | 22.5 | 1.7 | 6.9 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 46.2 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 48.4 | 10.1 |
| 2017 | LV | 4 | 19.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46.9 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 52.5 | 8.7 |
| 2016 | LV | 2 | 17.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5 | 50.0 | — | 50.0 | 4.4 |
| Career | — | 10 | 21.8 | 19.2 | 11.3 | 6.2 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 8.1 | 15.4 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 52.8 | 50.0 | 66.7 | 60.3 | 9.2 |
Shot Chart (Career)
| Zone | FGA | FGM | FG% | Freq% | Pool% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted Area | 31 | 22 | 71.0% | 43.1% | — |
| In The Paint (Non-RA) | 11 | 3 | 27.3% | 15.3% | — |
| Mid-Range | 10 | 3 | 30.0% | 13.9% | — |
| Left Corner 3 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 1.4% | — |
| Right Corner 3 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 1.4% | — |
| Above the Break 3 | 18 | 8 | 44.4% | 25.0% | — |
Shot Diet
Rim
31%
Mid
38%
3PT
31%
Corner 3
0%
Recent Games
Game Log →
| Date | Venue | Opp | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FGM | FGA | 3PM | 3PA | FTM | FTA | GmSc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-13 | Las Vegas | OKC | 26.1 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17.6 |
| 2021-08-11 | Las Vegas | TOR | 25.6 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15.6 |
| 2021-08-09 | Las Vegas | ORL | 28.1 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5.3 |
| 2021-08-04 | California Classic | MIA | 26.1 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10.1 |
| 2017-07-14 | Las Vegas | UTA | 18.3 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12.7 |
2016 Draft Combine Statistics
Percentile rankings vs current draft class
21
Percentile
Composite Combine Score
Weighted blend of three combine categories: Anthropometrics (40%), Athletic Testing (40%), and Shooting (20%). Each category is a normalized z-score across the selected comparison group. Players missing a category have their weights redistributed across the remaining categories.
Below Average
vs. 2016 Draft Class
Anthro
18
Athletic
36
Blends measurements, athleticism & shooting
Rank
#45
of 56
Head-to-Head Comparison
Compare Gary Payton II against other prospects
Gary Payton II
Player Comparisons
Similar players based on physical and statistical profiles