Austin Daye — Player Profile
Bio
College Production
PPG
12.7
Points
RPG
6.8
Rebounds
APG
1.1
Assists
SPG
0.7
BPG
2.1
TOV
2.1
MPG
26.3
Games
34
Started
—
Shooting Splits
FG%
47.7
3P%
42.9
1.1-2.5 3P/g
FT%
70.6
2.3-3.2 FT/g
Summer League
PTS
16.3
Points
REB
6.9
Rebounds
AST
2.0
Assists
| Season | Lg | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | FGM | FGA | 3PM | 3PA | FTM | FTA | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | GmSc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | LV | 6 | 27.3 | 16.3 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 13.8 | 1.5 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 34.9 | 24.3 | 86.1 | 49.6 | 10.6 |
| 2012 | ORL | 5 | 26.0 | 15.8 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 10.2 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 51.0 | 35.3 | 91.3 | 64.6 | 13.9 |
| 2010 | LV | 3 | 25.1 | 15.7 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 13.0 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 6.3 | 38.5 | 44.4 | 68.4 | 49.6 | 7.4 |
| 2009 | LV | 5 | 33.8 | 17.0 | 8.8 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 6.4 | 13.6 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 47.1 | 29.4 | 76.2 | 55.0 | 9.9 |
| Career | — | 19 | 28.3 | 16.3 | 6.9 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 5.4 | 12.7 | 1.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 42.3 | 30.0 | 81.8 | 54.3 | 10.7 |
| 2014 | LV | 6 | 27.3 | 21.5 | 8.8 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 6.4 | 18.2 | 2.0 | 8.1 | 6.8 | 7.9 | 34.9 | 24.3 | 86.1 | 49.6 | 10.6 |
| 2012 | ORL | 5 | 26.0 | 21.9 | 10.2 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 7.2 | 14.1 | 1.7 | 4.7 | 5.8 | 6.4 | 51.0 | 35.3 | 91.3 | 64.6 | 13.9 |
| 2010 | LV | 3 | 25.1 | 22.5 | 5.3 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 7.2 | 18.7 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 9.1 | 38.5 | 44.4 | 68.4 | 49.6 | 7.4 |
| 2009 | LV | 5 | 33.8 | 18.1 | 9.4 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 6.8 | 14.5 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 47.1 | 29.4 | 76.2 | 55.0 | 9.9 |
| Career | — | 19 | 28.3 | 20.7 | 8.8 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 6.8 | 16.1 | 1.6 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 6.6 | 42.3 | 30.0 | 81.8 | 54.3 | 10.7 |
| 2014 | LV | 6 | 27.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.9 | 24.3 | 86.1 | 49.6 | 10.6 |
| 2012 | ORL | 5 | 26.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 51.0 | 35.3 | 91.3 | 64.6 | 13.9 |
| 2010 | LV | 3 | 25.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38.5 | 44.4 | 68.4 | 49.6 | 7.4 |
| 2009 | LV | 5 | 33.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 47.1 | 29.4 | 76.2 | 55.0 | 9.9 |
| Career | — | 19 | 28.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.3 | 30.0 | 81.8 | 54.3 | 10.7 |
Shot Chart (Career)
| Zone | FGA | FGM | FG% | Freq% | Pool% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted Area | 54 | 34 | 63.0% | 22.6% | — |
| In The Paint (Non-RA) | 37 | 11 | 29.7% | 15.5% | — |
| Mid-Range | 70 | 33 | 47.1% | 29.3% | — |
| Left Corner 3 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | 1.7% | — |
| Right Corner 3 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% | 2.5% | — |
| Above the Break 3 | 68 | 20 | 29.4% | 28.5% | — |
Shot Diet
Rim
13%
Mid
43%
3PT
44%
Corner 3
4%
Recent Games
Game Log →
| Date | Venue | Opp | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FGM | FGA | 3PM | 3PA | FTM | FTA | GmSc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-07-19 | Las Vegas | WAS | 38.0 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 12 | 17.9 |
| 2014-07-17 | Las Vegas | UTA | 29.0 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 12.1 |
| 2014-07-16 | Las Vegas | MIL | 17.0 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7.3 |
| 2014-07-14 | Las Vegas | NOP | 28.0 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 16.2 |
| 2014-07-13 | Las Vegas | CLE | 23.0 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2.9 |
2009 Draft Combine Statistics
Percentile rankings vs current draft class
6
Percentile
Composite Combine Score
Weighted blend of three combine categories: Anthropometrics (40%), Athletic Testing (40%), and Shooting (20%). Each category is a normalized z-score across the selected comparison group. Players missing a category have their weights redistributed across the remaining categories.
Poor
vs. 2009 Draft Class
Anthro
91
Athletic
2
Blends measurements, athleticism & shooting
Rank
#44
of 46
Head-to-Head Comparison
Compare Austin Daye against other prospects
Austin Daye
Select Players
Austin Daye
Player B
| Austin Daye | Metric | Player B |
|---|
Player Comparisons
Similar players based on physical and statistical profiles