Summer League
Competition Context
How each Summer League environment actually played — pooled pace, shooting, and field composition per season or per competition. Every rate is recomputed from raw totals; coverage and freshness are disclosed.
Individual competitions — one row per competition edition (e.g. 2025 Las Vegas).
44 results · Download CSV
| Scope | Year ▾ | Venue | Comps | Final GP | Scheduled | Players | Unresolved | Points / Team Game | Possessions / Team Game | Pace (per 48) | Offensive Rating | 3PA Share | 3P% | Free-Throw Rate | Offensive Rebound Rate | Turnover Rate | Assisted-FG Rate | Rim Attempt Share | Rim FG% | Avg Score Margin | Close-Game Share | Overtime Share | Team ORtg Spread (IQR) | Team Scoring Spread (IQR) | Top-Decile Minutes Share | Top-Decile Points Share | Team Count | Rookie Share | Returner Share | Drafted Share | Undrafted Share | Not-Yet-Drafted Share | First-Round Share | Second-Round Share | Lottery Share | Median Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 California Classic Summer League | 2026 | California Classic | 1 | 12 | 0 | 69 | 47 | 86.9 | 79.0 | 94.5 | 110.0 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 10.0% | 70.0% | 12.3 | 30.0% | 10.0% | 13.4 | 11.5 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 8 | 53.6% | 46.4% | 44.9% | 17.4% | 0.0% | 15.9% | 29.0% | 7.2% | 23.4 |
| 2026 Las Vegas Summer League | 2026 | Las Vegas | 1 | 76 | 0 | 277 | 172 | 90.9 | 81.0 | 96.9 | 112.2 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 12.2 | 20.0% | 10.0% | 16.6 | 16.0 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 30 | 48.7% | 51.3% | 47.3% | 17.3% | 0.0% | 21.7% | 25.6% | 8.7% | 23.4 |
| 2026 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2026 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 34 | 27 | 92.3 | 81.6 | 97.1 | 113.1 | 40.0% | 40.0% | 20.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 70.0% | 20.0% | 70.0% | 16.7 | 30.0% | 20.0% | 23.8 | 22.2 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 52.9% | 17.6% | 0.0% | 35.3% | 17.6% | 23.5% | 22.8 |
| 2025 California Classic Summer League | 2025 | California Classic | 1 | 6 | 0 | 36 | 26 | 86.1 | 82.7 | 99.7 | 104.1 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 70.0% | 9.2 | 50.0% | — | 15.1 | 6.5 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 4 | 36.1% | 63.9% | 38.9% | 44.4% | 0.0% | 22.2% | 16.7% | 5.6% | 24.2 |
| 2025 Las Vegas Summer League | 2025 | Las Vegas | 1 | 76 | 0 | 263 | 183 | 90.2 | 86.7 | 104.4 | 104.0 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 11.9 | 30.0% | — | 16.9 | 16.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 30 | 36.9% | 63.1% | 48.7% | 38.4% | 0.4% | 22.1% | 26.6% | 8.0% | 23.5 |
| 2025 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2025 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 36 | 21 | 91.1 | 87.2 | 104.6 | 104.5 | 40.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 70.0% | 5.5 | 70.0% | — | 13.7 | 7.2 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 4 | 36.1% | 63.9% | 50.0% | 38.9% | 0.0% | 22.2% | 27.8% | 8.3% | 22.8 |
| 2024 Las Vegas Summer League | 2024 | Las Vegas | 1 | 76 | 0 | 261 | 167 | 89.8 | 84.9 | 102.4 | 105.8 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 10.2 | 30.0% | — | 17.3 | 17.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 30 | 36.8% | 63.2% | 49.0% | 43.7% | 0.4% | 24.5% | 24.5% | 8.8% | 23.5 |
| 2024 California Classic Summer League | 2024 | California Classic | 1 | 12 | 0 | 48 | 62 | 81.1 | 80.7 | 98.3 | 100.5 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 10.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 22.0 | 20.0% | — | 33.4 | 25.5 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 8 | 39.6% | 60.4% | 35.4% | 54.2% | 2.1% | 18.8% | 16.7% | 4.2% | 23.8 |
| 2024 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2024 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 37 | 19 | 88.8 | 86.9 | 102.4 | 102.3 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 8.0 | 50.0% | — | 14.6 | 11.8 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 4 | 56.8% | 43.2% | 56.8% | 37.8% | 0.0% | 37.8% | 18.9% | 10.8% | 22.9 |
| 2023 Las Vegas Summer League | 2023 | Las Vegas | 1 | 76 | 0 | 267 | 167 | 91.5 | 86.6 | 103.8 | 105.6 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 10.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 10.6 | 30.0% | — | 17.3 | 16.0 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 30 | 37.8% | 62.2% | 47.6% | 45.3% | 0.0% | 21.7% | 25.8% | 9.7% | 23.2 |
| 2023 California Classic Summer League | 2023 | California Classic | 1 | 6 | 0 | 49 | 31 | 94.2 | 86.4 | 103.7 | 109.1 | 40.0% | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 70.0% | 13.2 | 0.0% | — | 16.2 | 11.0 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 6 | 46.9% | 53.1% | 40.8% | 53.1% | 0.0% | 18.4% | 22.4% | 6.1% | 22.9 |
| 2023 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2023 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 33 | 18 | 93.0 | 89.6 | 107.5 | 103.8 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 9.0 | 20.0% | — | 9.1 | 6.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 4 | 21.2% | 78.8% | 45.5% | 42.4% | 0.0% | 30.3% | 15.2% | 12.1% | 22.7 |
| 2022 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2022 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 45 | 12 | 86.8 | 86.3 | 103.6 | 100.5 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 70.0% | 9.5 | 50.0% | — | 18.9 | 16.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 4 | 46.7% | 53.3% | 57.8% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 26.7% | 31.1% | 11.1% | 22.9 |
| 2022 California Classic Summer League | 2022 | California Classic | 1 | 6 | 0 | 25 | 31 | 80.7 | 80.8 | 96.9 | 99.9 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 21.3 | 0.0% | — | 22.3 | 19.2 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 4 | 52.0% | 48.0% | 24.0% | 76.0% | 0.0% | 8.0% | 16.0% | 8.0% | 23.1 |
| 2022 Las Vegas Summer League | 2022 | Las Vegas | 1 | 75 | 0 | 262 | 173 | 87.0 | 85.1 | 102.0 | 102.2 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 11.2 | 20.0% | — | 16.4 | 14.0 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 30 | 42.7% | 57.3% | 45.8% | 49.6% | 0.4% | 19.1% | 26.7% | 8.0% | 23.0 |
| 2021 California Classic Summer League | 2021 | California Classic | 1 | 4 | 0 | 32 | 22 | 83.5 | 84.5 | 100.2 | 98.8 | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 30.0% | 70.0% | 6.5 | 20.0% | — | 8.4 | 8.0 | 20.0% | 30.0% | 4 | 71.9% | 28.1% | 21.9% | 78.1% | 0.0% | 12.5% | 9.4% | 12.5% | 23.1 |
| 2021 Las Vegas Summer League | 2021 | Las Vegas | 1 | 75 | 0 | 265 | 150 | 84.5 | 84.0 | 101.4 | 100.6 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 30.0% | 10.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 10.9 | 30.0% | — | 16.1 | 16.8 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 30 | 63.4% | 36.6% | 51.3% | 47.2% | 0.0% | 23.8% | 27.5% | 10.9% | 23.2 |
| 2021 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2021 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 29 | 23 | 76.8 | 82.5 | 99.0 | 93.1 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 30.0% | 10.0% | 50.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 22.3 | 20.0% | — | 21.4 | 19.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 4 | 51.7% | 48.3% | 37.9% | 62.1% | 0.0% | 20.7% | 17.2% | 6.9% | 24.0 |
| 2019 California Classic Summer League | 2019 | California Classic | 1 | 6 | 0 | 30 | 25 | 87.0 | 83.6 | 100.4 | 104.0 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 40.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 8.7 | 50.0% | — | 15.6 | 19.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 4 | 46.7% | 53.3% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 23.3% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 22.9 |
| 2019 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2019 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 30 | 28 | 82.8 | 84.1 | 100.9 | 98.4 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 11.8 | 20.0% | — | 14.8 | 8.2 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 4 | 56.7% | 43.3% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 13.3% | 26.7% | 3.3% | 23.2 |
| 2019 Las Vegas Summer League | 2019 | Las Vegas | 1 | 82 | 0 | 251 | 219 | 86.1 | 85.6 | 102.5 | 100.5 | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 11.2 | 30.0% | — | 16.3 | 16.0 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 32 | 47.4% | 52.6% | 42.2% | 56.6% | 0.4% | 18.7% | 23.5% | 6.4% | 23.0 |
| 2018 California Classic Summer League | 2018 | California Classic | 1 | 6 | 0 | 25 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 10.7 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 52.0% | 48.0% | 56.0% | 44.0% | 0.0% | 44.0% | 12.0% | 16.0% | 22.6 |
| 2018 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2018 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 29 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 11.3 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 55.2% | 44.8% | 51.7% | 48.3% | 0.0% | 24.1% | 27.6% | 6.9% | 22.8 |
| 2018 Las Vegas Summer League | 2018 | Las Vegas | 1 | 82 | 0 | 226 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 10.5 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 26 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 57.1% | 42.0% | 0.4% | 27.9% | 29.2% | 9.7% | 22.9 |
| 2017 Orlando Summer League | 2017 | Orlando | 1 | 20 | 0 | 55 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.0 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 20.0% | 80.0% | 47.3% | 52.7% | 0.0% | 12.7% | 34.5% | 5.5% | 24.1 |
| 2017 Las Vegas Summer League | 2017 | Las Vegas | 1 | 67 | 0 | 169 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 8.6 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 30.8% | 69.2% | 58.6% | 41.4% | 0.0% | 32.5% | 26.0% | 15.4% | 23.1 |
| 2017 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2017 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 29 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 7.0 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 31.0% | 69.0% | 75.9% | 24.1% | 0.0% | 37.9% | 37.9% | 20.7% | 22.8 |
| 2016 Las Vegas Summer League | 2016 | Las Vegas | 1 | 67 | 0 | 172 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 40.7% | 59.3% | 51.7% | 47.7% | 0.6% | 26.7% | 25.0% | 12.8% | 23.1 |
| 2016 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2016 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 28 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 8.7 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 57.1% | 42.9% | 0.0% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 7.1% | 22.4 |
| 2016 Orlando Summer League | 2016 | Orlando | 1 | 25 | 0 | 65 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 11.3 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 29.2% | 70.8% | 49.2% | 50.8% | 0.0% | 20.0% | 29.2% | 9.2% | 23.8 |
| 2015 Orlando Summer League | 2015 | Orlando | 1 | 25 | 0 | 64 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.8 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 34.4% | 65.6% | 53.1% | 46.9% | 0.0% | 26.6% | 26.6% | 12.5% | 23.4 |
| 2015 Salt Lake City Summer League | 2015 | Salt Lake City | 1 | 6 | 0 | 31 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 9.5 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 41.9% | 58.1% | 58.1% | 41.9% | 0.0% | 35.5% | 22.6% | 16.1% | 22.2 |
| 2015 Las Vegas Summer League | 2015 | Las Vegas | 1 | 67 | 0 | 171 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 9.7 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 35.1% | 64.9% | 52.0% | 46.8% | 0.0% | 26.9% | 25.1% | 12.3% | 23.6 |
| 2014 Orlando Summer League | 2014 | Orlando | 1 | 25 | 0 | 76 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 12.2 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 44.7% | 55.3% | 55.3% | 44.7% | 0.0% | 27.6% | 27.6% | 10.5% | 23.4 |
| 2014 Las Vegas Summer League | 2014 | Las Vegas | 1 | 67 | 0 | 184 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 11.5 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 42.4% | 57.6% | 54.9% | 44.0% | 0.0% | 28.8% | 26.1% | 12.5% | 23.5 |
| 2013 Las Vegas Summer League | 2013 | Las Vegas | 1 | 61 | 0 | 164 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.2 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 35.4% | 64.6% | 57.3% | 42.1% | 0.6% | 26.8% | 30.5% | 12.8% | 23.7 |
| 2013 Orlando Summer League | 2013 | Orlando | 1 | 25 | 0 | 82 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 9.8 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 41.5% | 58.5% | 58.5% | 40.2% | 0.0% | 30.5% | 28.0% | 11.0% | 23.3 |
| 2012 Orlando Summer League | 2012 | Orlando | 1 | 20 | 0 | 65 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | 60.0% | 8.0 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 66.2% | 33.8% | 64.6% | 35.4% | 0.0% | 33.8% | 30.8% | 10.8% | 23.6 |
| 2012 Las Vegas Summer League | 2012 | Las Vegas | 1 | 60 | 0 | 175 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 12.5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 65.1% | 34.9% | 61.7% | 36.6% | 0.0% | 36.0% | 25.7% | 16.0% | 23.4 |
| 2010 Las Vegas Summer League | 2010 | Las Vegas | 1 | 58 | 0 | 142 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.9 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 32.4% | 67.6% | 63.4% | 35.2% | 0.0% | 35.2% | 28.2% | 13.4% | 23.7 |
| 2010 Orlando Summer League | 2010 | Orlando | 1 | 20 | 0 | 58 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 8.8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 34.5% | 65.5% | 65.5% | 29.3% | 0.0% | 36.2% | 29.3% | 13.8% | 23.9 |
| 2009 Las Vegas Summer League | 2009 | Las Vegas | 1 | 55 | 0 | 172 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 9.3 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 48.8% | 51.2% | 57.0% | 41.3% | 0.0% | 32.0% | 25.0% | 15.7% | 23.6 |
| 2008 Las Vegas Summer League | 2008 | Las Vegas | 1 | 53 | 0 | 168 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 50.0% | 9.5 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 64.9% | 35.1% | 55.4% | 42.9% | 0.6% | 31.0% | 24.4% | 13.7% | 23.7 |
| 2007 Las Vegas Summer League | 2007 | Las Vegas | 1 | 55 | 0 | 144 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | 60.0% | 9.7 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 66.0% | 32.6% | 0.0% | 35.4% | 30.6% | 16.7% | 23.3 |
Competition profile
2023 Salt Lake City Summer League
Identity & format
- Year
- 2023
- Venue
- Salt Lake City
- Dates
- — – —
- Final games
- 6
- Scheduled / not-final
- 0
- Teams
- 4
- Players (resolved)
- 33 +18 unresolved
- Participation (roster)
- not modeled
- Player-games
- 118
Field composition
Who was in the field — counted by distinct resolved player at event time. Unknown attributes are disclosed, never dropped from a denominator.
Draft status
29 known · 4 unknown · 33 total
- drafted15
- unknown4
- undrafted14
Draft class
19 known · 14 unknown · 33 total
- 20181
- 20202
- 20214
- 20229
- 20233
Age
29 known · 4 unknown · 33 total
Age reference date
0 known · 29 unknown · 29 total
known = age computed at the exact competition/appearance date; unknown = July 1 fallback used because the event date was unavailable.
Position
28 known · 5 unknown · 33 total
- C5
- F9
- G9
- sg3
- pf_c1
- sg_sf1
Position source
23 known · 5 unknown · 28 total
known = event-time roster/starter position; unknown = canonical player_status position used as a labeled fallback.
Appearance number
33 known · 0 unknown · 33 total
- 17
- 215
- 310
- 4+1
College / international origin
0 known · 33 unknown · 33 total
Pre-event college/international affiliation provenance is not yet sufficient to certify this distribution in v1; disclosed as fully unavailable rather than inferred from current biography.
Coverage notes
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Team Count
4
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
count(distinct team_entry_id) pooled over box-complete final games- Denominator
- N/A -- direct count, not a ratio; no box-complete final games -> 0
- Unit
- count
- Reading
- Distinct team entries that fielded a box-complete final game in this scope. A season profile counts each member competition's team entries separately: the same NBA franchise fielding rosters at two venues in one summer counts as two team entries, not one franchise -- this reuses the existing stored distinct_teams/team_entry_ids definition rather than a new franchise-deduplicated meaning computed at request time.
Rookie Share
21.2%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
rookie_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field in its first Summer League appearance.
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Returner Share
78.8%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
returner_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field returning from a prior Summer League.
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Drafted Share
45.5%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
drafted_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field drafted at or before event time.
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Undrafted Share
42.4%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
undrafted_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field undrafted as of event time.
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Not-Yet-Drafted Share
0.0%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
not_yet_drafted_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field whose draft_year is after event time -- distinct from undrafted (contract §5: 'not yet drafted', never retrospectively undrafted).
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
First-Round Share
30.3%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
first_round_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field drafted in the first round.
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Second-Round Share
15.2%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
second_round_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field drafted in the second round.
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Lottery Share
12.1%
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
lottery_count / appeared_players- Denominator
- distinct resolved appeared players; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of the field drafted in the lottery (round 1, pick <= 14).
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
Median Age
22.7
partial (33/51)
Definition
- Formula
median(age_at_competition_start of resolved appeared players)- Denominator
- resolved appeared players with a known birthdate; 0 -> None
- Unit
- years
- Reading
- Median event-time age of the field.
- Coverage note
- 33 of 51 games carried identity input
How it played
Pooled team-box environment: every rate recomputes from summed numerators and denominators, never an average of competition rates.
Coverage notes
- no game carried ot_state input
Points / Team Game
93.0
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(team_pts) / team_game_count- Denominator
- team games (2 per box-complete final game); 0 -> None
- Unit
- points
- Reading
- Average points a team scored per game in this environment.
Possessions / Team Game
89.6
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(Box.poss(team, opponent)) / team_game_count- Denominator
- team games; 0 -> None
- Unit
- possessions
- Reading
- Estimated possessions used per team game.
Pace (per 48)
107.5
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
48 * sum(possessions) / (sum(team_minutes) / 5)- Denominator
- team minutes / 5 (team-minute-fifths); 0 -> None
- Unit
- pace
- Reading
- Possessions a team would use over 48 minutes (SL pace is per-48).
Offensive Rating
103.8
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
100 * sum(pts) / sum(possessions)- Denominator
- estimated possessions; 0 -> None
- Unit
- rating
- Reading
- Points scored per 100 possessions across the environment.
3PA Share
40.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(fg3a) / sum(fga)- Denominator
- field-goal attempts; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of shot attempts taken from three.
3P%
30.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(fg3m) / sum(fg3a)- Denominator
- three-point attempts; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Three-point accuracy across the environment.
Free-Throw Rate
30.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(fta) / sum(fga)- Denominator
- field-goal attempts; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Free-throw attempts drawn per field-goal attempt.
Offensive Rebound Rate
20.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(oreb) / (sum(oreb) + sum(dreb))- Denominator
- all rebounds (pooled OREB + DREB); 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of missed shots recovered by the offense.
Turnover Rate
20.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(tov) / (sum(fga) + 0.44 * sum(fta) + sum(tov))- Denominator
- field-goal attempts + 0.44 * free-throw attempts + turnovers; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of team plays (FGA + 0.44*FTA + TOV) ending in a turnover.
Assisted-FG Rate
60.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(ast) / sum(fgm)- Denominator
- made field goals; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of made field goals that were assisted (AST/FGM), not player AST%.
Rim Attempt Share
30.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(rim_fga) / sum(shot_fga)- Denominator
- shot-chart field-goal attempts (backcourt excluded); 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of shots taken at the rim (Restricted Area).
Rim FG%
60.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(rim_fgm) / sum(rim_fga)- Denominator
- rim field-goal attempts; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Finishing accuracy at the rim.
Avg Score Margin
9.0
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(abs(home_score - away_score)) / games_with_score- Denominator
- final games with a known score; 0 -> None
- Unit
- points
- Reading
- Average final-margin size; lower means tighter games.
Close-Game Share
20.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
count(abs(margin) <= 5) / games_with_score- Denominator
- final games with a known score; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of games decided by 5 points or fewer.
Overtime Share
—
unavailable (0/6)
Definition
- Formula
count(status_text ILIKE '%OT%') / games_with_known_ot- Denominator
- final games with a known OT state; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Share of games that reached overtime.
- Caveat
- OT inferred from raw status_text, not a normalized flag; populated only for 2026+.
- Coverage note
- no game carried ot_state input
Performance landscape
Descriptive spread and concentration — not a player-development conclusion.
Team ORtg Spread (IQR)
9.1
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
Q3(team_offensive_rating) - Q1(team_offensive_rating)- Denominator
- box-complete team-game offensive ratings; <4 games -> None
- Unit
- rating
- Reading
- Interquartile spread of team offensive ratings; how varied the offenses were.
Team Scoring Spread (IQR)
6.0
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
Q3(team_points_per_game) - Q1(team_points_per_game)- Denominator
- box-complete team-game point totals; <4 games -> None
- Unit
- points
- Reading
- Interquartile spread of team scoring (points per team game); the scoring-distribution companion to the ORtg spread above.
Top-Decile Minutes Share
20.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(minutes of top-10% players by minutes) / sum(all minutes)- Denominator
- total appeared-player minutes; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Minutes concentration among the busiest players.
Top-Decile Points Share
20.0%
complete (6/6)
Definition
- Formula
sum(points of top-10% players by points) / sum(all points)- Denominator
- total appeared-player points; 0 -> None
- Unit
- ratio
- Reading
- Scoring concentration among the top producers.
Leaders in this scope
Same Players Explorer eligibility (2+ games, 60+ minutes, per-game).
Points →
- 1 Tre Mann 23.7
- 2 Ochai Agbaji 19.0
- 3 Terquavion Smith 15.7
Rebounds →
- 1 Ochai Agbaji 9.0
- 2 Filip Petrušev 7.3
- 3 Micah Potter 7.0
Assists →
- 1 Keyonte George 4.3
- 2 Jared Butler 4.0
- 3 Javonte Smart 3.7
Data confidence
Box score
complete (6/6)
Shot chart
complete (6/6)
Final score
complete (6/6)
Overtime state
unavailable (0/6)
Play-by-play informational
unavailable (0/6)
Player identity
partial (33/51)
- Calculated
- 2026-08-26 04:15 UTC
- Source watermark
- 2026-08-22 13:35 UTC
- Publication version
- v1
- Calc version
- 2026.07.6
- Registry
- 2026.07.3
- Raw run(s)
- 36
Source references
- Box score 2026-07-01 23:51 UTC 12 rows parse: PARSED source: COMPLETE
- Shot chart 2026-07-01 23:52 UTC 908 rows parse: PARSED source: COMPLETE
- Final score 2026-07-01 23:51 UTC 6 rows source: COMPLETE
- Player identity 2026-08-22 13:35 UTC 118 rows source: COMPLETE
- Game schedule / status 2026-07-01 23:51 UTC 6 rows source: COMPLETE
Stable scope key: competition:36